The high profile murder trial of Molly Katanga took a dramatic turn today as defence lawyers exposed potential holes in the prosecution’s case, raising serious questions about the credibility of key evidence. The trial centres around the death of businessman Henry Katanga, with DNA evidence allegedly linking Molly Katanga and her daughter, Patricia, to the crime scene.
Defence Counsel Ellison Karuhanga rigorously cross-examined Police Chief Andrew Mubiru, who also serves as the director of the forensic lab, challenging his claims regarding the lab’s accreditation and independence.
Karuhanga presented a letter from the Inspector General of Police stipulating that the lab needed authorisation to share Molly Katanga’s details with the court, directly contradicting Mubiru’s assertion of ISO accreditation.
Further intensifying the scrutiny, the defence team highlighted a glaring discrepancy. The Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions charged Molly Katanga with murder in January 2024, based on DNA results that were, according to Mubiru’s testimony, not available until April 30, 2024.
This discrepancy has cast a shadow of doubt over the prosecution’s timeline, suggesting potential procedural errors at best and raising concerns about motive at worst. Mubiru’s woes continued as defence lawyer MacDusman Kabega brought to light a past Court of Appeal decision where Mubiru faced accusations of falsifying results.
Additionally, the defence raised concerns about the DNA analysis itself. The analysis pointed to the presence of genetic material from an unidentified fourth person on the firearm. This revelation, combined with the use of an outdated and potentially unreliable Euroformics program version for the analysis, further fuelled doubts about the evidence’s integrity.
The defence also highlighted concerns about potential contamination of the murder weapon, particularly given Mubiru’s admission of personally handling the DNA swab, using the sample swab, and disposing of it – procedures that deviate from standard evidence collection protocols.
As the trial proceeds, the prosecution faces the daunting task of restoring credibility to its case. The defence is expected to maintain its pressure on Mubiru, demanding clarity on the forensic lab’s practices and any potential irregularities that might have compromised the investigation.
The trial hinges on the court’s ability to separate truth from fabrication and ensure that justice is served, a task made even more challenging by the complexities of the evidence and the questions swirling around the police chief’s testimony.
In a stunning turn of events, the Katanga trial has captivated public attention as the defence dismantles the police chief’s testimony, leaving the prosecution scrambling to salvage its case.
ALSO READ: Residents Clash with Authorities Over Lubigi Wetland Evictions
With the reliability of the forensic evidence called into question, the trial hangs in the balance, underscoring the critical importance of due process and the unwavering pursuit of justice.
